UAE Denies Sudanese Claims of Shot-Down Plane Carrying Colombian Mercenaries

August 9, 2025 by
Administrator

UAE Denies Sudanese Claims of Shot-Down Plane Carrying Colombian Mercenaries

In a dramatic and rapidly escalating diplomatic incident, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has vehemently denied claims by the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) that it shot down a UAE aircraft allegedly carrying Colombian mercenary soldiers for the rival Rapid Support Forces (RSF). The accusation, which came amidst the grinding, year-long conflict in Sudan, has been dismissed by Abu Dhabi as "absolute lies," yet a statement from Colombia’s president lends a layer of stark credibility to the Sudanese report. This event has thrust the Sudanese civil war onto a new international stage, highlighting the complex web of foreign interests and proxy conflicts at play.

The Sudanese Armed Forces' Accusation: A Spark Igniting an Old Fire

For over a year, Sudan has been ravaged by a brutal war between the SAF and the RSF, causing a humanitarian catastrophe with millions displaced and tens of thousands killed. The SAF, led by General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, has long accused the UAE of providing critical support to its rival, a charge Abu Dhabi has consistently denied, instead professing its commitment to peace in Sudan.

That dynamic changed dramatically last Wednesday. Sudanese state television announced that the Sudanese Air Force had shot down a UAE aircraft in the war-torn Darfur region, specifically at an RSF-controlled airport. The claim was particularly explosive: the plane was allegedly ferrying 40 Colombian mercenaries to aid the RSF. An anonymous Sudanese military source further reinforced the claim, stating the aircraft was "hit and completely destroyed" on the tarmac of Nyala airport. This bold assertion from the Sudanese government was designed to expose what it has long presented as a foreign conspiracy against its sovereignty, escalating the diplomatic confrontation to a new level.

Abu Dhabi's Firm Rebuttal: "Baseless Accusations and Absolute Lies"

The response from the UAE was swift, firm, and unequivocal. Speaking to AFP, an Emirati official dismissed the claims as "baseless accusations" and "absolute lies" that were unsupported by any evidence. This strong language reflects the high stakes of the situation for the UAE, which is eager to protect its international reputation and avoid being officially implicated in a conflict widely condemned for its humanitarian toll. The denial aims to quash the narrative that Abu Dhabi is a direct party to the war, framing the Sudanese government's claims as a desperate propaganda effort.

However, the lack of independent verification from a highly restricted conflict zone makes it incredibly difficult to ascertain the truth, leaving the public to navigate a fog of war and competing narratives.

Colombia's Response: A Glimmer of Confirmation

The dispute took a significant turn when it was acknowledged by a third party. Colombian President Gustavo Petro's statement added a crucial new dimension to the incident. On Thursday, he revealed that his government was actively trying to verify how many Colombians had been killed in the attack and whether they could repatriate the bodies. This statement, far from a denial, effectively gave credence to the Sudanese military's claim, at least in part. President Petro's remarks not only shed light on the shadowy world of mercenaries in modern conflicts but also put the UAE in an even more challenging diplomatic position. The possibility that a sovereign nation is attempting to recover the bodies of its citizens from a battlefield abroad adds a powerful, humanizing element to the tragedy and makes Abu Dhabi’s outright denial much harder to defend.

The Broader Geopolitical Ripple Effect

This incident is not just a localized event; it is a symptom of a larger geopolitical chessboard. The Sudanese conflict has long been a proxy war for regional powers, with allegations of external support flowing to both the SAF and RSF. The Red Sea, a vital global trade route, is central to these interests, and the stability of Sudan has direct implications for its security. By publicly accusing the UAE, the Sudanese government is not only challenging Abu Dhabi but also seeking to galvanize international attention and possibly pressure from the global community.

As the world watches, the outcome of this diplomatic standoff and the results of Colombia's investigation could have far-reaching consequences. It may force greater transparency from external actors in the Sudanese war, or it could simply be another flashpoint in a conflict where truth is often the first casualty. The fate of the 40 alleged Colombian mercenaries remains unknown, and the diplomatic fallout between Khartoum and Abu Dhabi is just beginning.

#Sudan #UAE #SudanConflict #Darfur #Geopolitics #Mercenaries #Colombia #SAF #RSF #InternationalRelations #ProxyWar #SudanCivilWar